poliphilo: (Default)
poliphilo ([personal profile] poliphilo) wrote2011-08-03 10:23 am

War Crime

On July 20 NATO attacked the headquarters of the Libyan state broadcaster Al-Jamahiriyah and two of its installations. According to Libyan sources- which cannot be verified- three journalists were killed and twenty one injured. 

Jean-Francois Juillard, secretary general of Reporters without Frontiers has said,

“We remind NATO that news media are civilian installations and cannot be regarded as military objectives. Even if Al-Jamahiriya is clearly used by the Gaddafi regime as a propaganda outlet, it does not in any way legitimize these attacks. Other means, such as support for independent media, must be used to minimize the regime’s propaganda and threats."

“We call for a transparent investigation into the circumstances of these airstrikes. Military attacks on civilian installations constitute war crimes and serious violations of the Geneva Conventions. It is essential to establish who was responsible.”

A fuller report can be read here.

[identity profile] michaleen.livejournal.com 2011-08-03 10:11 am (UTC)(link)
"Support for independent media"? I know this is supposed to be serious, but it is hard to not laugh at a suggestion like that.

Also, it's kind of funny that "Reporters without Frontiers" would take an obviously self-serving claim made by a state actor at face value. It's lazy journalism like this that brought us the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq.

[identity profile] poliphilo.livejournal.com 2011-08-03 10:57 am (UTC)(link)
"Support of independent media"? It's a pious hope, but I don't see it's wrong to desire it.

Reporting of the Libyan conflict is obviously very difficult. Dodgy claims have been made on both sides. In the case of the attack on Al-Jamahiriya we have both sides saying it happened- so I guess there's no doubt about it. Even if no-one had been killed it would still be an attack on a civilian target and so illegal under the Geneva conventions.

[identity profile] michaleen.livejournal.com 2011-08-04 11:25 am (UTC)(link)
My point was not that independent media was undesirable, rather that it is extremely difficult if not impossible to see how such a suggestion might be implemented under the current circumstances.

I think they're blowing smoke, It's silly, and I think disingenuous, to compare US targeting of journalists in Iraq to either this incident or the one in the former Yugoslavia. If the broadcast facility were part of Gaddafi's command and control structure, then it was a legitimate target. The ruling on the Yugoslavia incident may or may not set a precedent that may or may not be applicable in this case.