poliphilo: (Default)
poliphilo ([personal profile] poliphilo) wrote2011-06-22 11:00 am

The Golden Rule

Because I'm a lazy sod I've never actually researched the allegation that the sayings of Jesus are plagiarised. Perhaps I will. One shouldn't pass these things on without being sure of the facts. The alleged sources are Jewish, Egyptian even Buddhist. Would first century writers in the Middle East have had access to Buddhist teachings? I don't see why not? If the citizens of Pompeii had Hindu figurines on their sideboards- and they did- why not Buddhist scriptures in their libraries?

One (positive) way of viewing the Christian scriptures is as a compendium of the wisdom of the ages.
 
OK, I'm going to do the research. How hard can it be? Here's something for starters.
 
One of the things Jesus is supposed to have originated, only he didn't  is the so-called golden rule. Among those who got there before him was the great Jewish rabbi, Hillel (who died c. AD 10). Challenged to summarise the Law while standing on one leg, Hillel came up with, "That which is hateful to you, do not do to your fellow. That is the whole Torah; the rest is the explanation; go and learn."

[identity profile] airstrip.livejournal.com 2011-06-22 10:19 am (UTC)(link)
Palestine is at a crossroads between a lot of different cultures and I think that the religious tradition reflects that. Judaism contains pieces from the general Afro-Asiatic traditions, whose language group it shares. It would not surprise me that Christianity reflects later developments--Hellenism and Alexandrian East-West transfers--in this region.

[identity profile] poliphilo.livejournal.com 2011-06-22 02:05 pm (UTC)(link)
Something that's beginning to interest me is the crossover between Christianity and Buddhism- both of which were producing key scriptures at around the same time.

[identity profile] airstrip.livejournal.com 2011-06-22 02:43 pm (UTC)(link)
I think the key thing is proselytizing by Graeco-Bactrian missionaries. That they arrived in Rome, complete with Indian religious ideas, is actually well attested: one member, a monk, set himself on fire in Athens and the event was well-attested at the time.

[identity profile] airstrip.livejournal.com 2011-06-22 02:43 pm (UTC)(link)
That would be first century.

[identity profile] poliphilo.livejournal.com 2011-06-23 09:18 pm (UTC)(link)
There was trade too I believe- going both ways. And thanks to Alexander, Greek culture already had a foothold in Afghanistan and Northern India.

[identity profile] veronikos.livejournal.com 2011-06-22 11:07 am (UTC)(link)
While not a saying of Jesus, per se, there appears in 1 John 4:18 an old Egyptian proverb: Perfect love casteth out fear. I'll give it in phonetic Middle Egyptian: MAH-ree DOUN ah-ZEENT.

Correction

[identity profile] veronikos.livejournal.com 2011-06-22 06:48 pm (UTC)(link)
Oh my...I think I messed that up.

The Middle Egyptian word for "love" is MAY-ree. "Pyramid" is MAH-ree. Sorry about that. Phonetically then:

MAY-ree DOUN ah-ZEENT.

I blame two things. The early hour of my first comment, and the fact that it hasn't been my native tongue for over 3500 years. :D



Re: Correction

[identity profile] poliphilo.livejournal.com 2011-06-22 08:04 pm (UTC)(link)
One gets out of practice over a millennia or three :)

[identity profile] xiphias.livejournal.com 2011-06-22 11:11 am (UTC)(link)
I don't think that it's fair to claim that Jesus plagarized the Golden Rule: "Therefore all things whatsoever ye would that men should do to you, do ye even so to them: for this is the law and the prophets."

He's referencing sources, and not claiming it's original to him.

Wikipedia has a pretty good compendium of formulations of Golden Rule-type things from various cultures and religions around the world:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Golden_Rule

[identity profile] arielstarshadow.livejournal.com 2011-06-22 12:41 pm (UTC)(link)
Perhaps a more accurate way to put this is not that Jesus plagiarized, but rather that many of his followers have insisted that much of Jesus' "references" were original thoughts of his own.

After all, it wasn't Jesus who wrote the many books of the New Testament. It was his disciples. And back then, no one really had any thoughts of "Hmmm, I need to footnote this."

But I think what [livejournal.com profile] poliphilo is getting at is that here and now, far too many people ignorantly assume that everything attributed to Jesus was his own original ideas.

[identity profile] poliphilo.livejournal.com 2011-06-22 02:06 pm (UTC)(link)
Exactly. You've said it for me.

[identity profile] poliphilo.livejournal.com 2011-06-22 02:08 pm (UTC)(link)
arielstarshadow has formulated my answer for me. :)

[identity profile] xiphias.livejournal.com 2011-06-22 05:23 pm (UTC)(link)
Well, I hope the Wikipedia link proves useful, then.

[identity profile] cluegirl.livejournal.com 2011-06-22 01:40 pm (UTC)(link)
Now this is a tagline I will be watching for -- I am fascinated by the anthropology of religion, but very well aware that I lack the educational groundwork and resources to even scratch the surface of which monk swiped which myth from whence, and why it seemed the thing to do at the time.

And yet when one compares basic mythic story structures between the Bible and just about any other source, the patterns are plain to discern. I'm really looking forward to seeing some of the history I rather knew had to be there.

*Watches over your shoulder.*

[identity profile] poliphilo.livejournal.com 2011-06-22 02:12 pm (UTC)(link)
This is something I should have done ages ago. Of course the Internet makes it easier. All the texts I want to be looking at seem to be online.

[identity profile] arielstarshadow.livejournal.com 2011-06-22 02:16 pm (UTC)(link)
You already know about the Internet Sacred Text Archive, yes?

http://www.sacred-texts.com/

[identity profile] poliphilo.livejournal.com 2011-06-22 02:35 pm (UTC)(link)
I've been looking at their copy of the Book of Enoch, but I hadn't been to their main page. Wow, what an amazing collection of stuff!

[identity profile] ooxc.livejournal.com 2011-06-22 03:04 pm (UTC)(link)
PS - you'll find this in line, I'm sure - I'm racking my memory for the author - but there was a well-known work in the 1980s, called Jesus the Jew, that dealt "very firmly" with the weird and very 20th century notion that Jesus was entirely opposed to all Jewish tradition and teaching.

[identity profile] poliphilo.livejournal.com 2011-06-22 08:06 pm (UTC)(link)
That is a weird idea.

I don't think I've read it. My reading of Christian texts tailed off in the mid 80s.

[identity profile] daisytells.livejournal.com 2011-06-22 08:19 pm (UTC)(link)
Why would anyone harbor a notion that Jesus was opposed to Jewish tradition and teaching? Circumcized on the eighth day, studied in the Temple, however briefly, quoted the Law and the Prophets endlessly as truths, referred at least one who wanted to follow him to go to the Law and the Prophets, said that he did not come to abolish the Law, and the night before he died he celebrated a Passover with his disciples. This does not sound like someone who was opposed to Jewish teachings and tradition. Also, to top it off, when Pilate asked him "Are you the King of the Jews?" Jesus responded, "You said it."

[identity profile] ooxc.livejournal.com 2011-06-22 09:32 pm (UTC)(link)
Why indeed? But it was widely held for centuries in Western Christendom. We're back again to the difference between what might be formally taught and what is widely held to be the case.
Three of your examples aren't all that strong - he didn't choose to be circumcised, there is some question whether the Last Supper was in fact a Passover celebration, and there is more than one interpretation of the reply to Pilate - but your principal point remains valid.









































[identity profile] ooxc.livejournal.com 2011-06-22 03:00 pm (UTC)(link)
Absolutely agree that it's only people who haven't really paid attention who think/claim that sayings of Jesus had never been said before - after all, he's quoted as saying that he's quoting!
i thin k that it was largely C S Lewis who scotched that idea for the 1940s and early 1950s, and pointed out that "mere" Christianity incorporates a huge bulk of pre-Christian ethics and beliefs - but I don't know how much he's read these days

[identity profile] poliphilo.livejournal.com 2011-06-22 08:03 pm (UTC)(link)
I read Lewis- or some of Lewis in the 70s and 80s. I get the impression he's still very popular.

[identity profile] daisytells.livejournal.com 2011-06-22 07:56 pm (UTC)(link)
Truth is truth regardless of who said it first. Can we call it plagiarism if someone who says it has never heard of or met the previous source? It has never been a secret that Hillel, who died in the year 10 C.E. during the time that Jesus lived, taught what we know as the golden rule. This is not surprising. My very fundamental study Bible has a footnote that reads as follows: "The so-called Golden Rule is found in negative form ("do not do")in rabbinic Judaism and also in Hinduism, Buddhism, and Confucianism. It occurred in various forms in Greek and Roman ethical teaching. Jesus stated it in positive form ("do to others what you would have them do to you, for this sums up the Law and the Prophets").

[identity profile] daisytells.livejournal.com 2011-06-22 08:04 pm (UTC)(link)
By the way, what a lot or people do not realize is that Jesus quoted from Scripture as well. "Perfect love casts out fear" is Old Testament. New Testament quotes of that proverb are nowhere in the sayings of Jesus - they appear in the book of Romans, and the Epistle of I John. Jesus often presaged a comment with "It is written..." Jesus using common truths in his talks is no more plagiarism than someone today stating a truth without citing a source, which they may or may not be familiar with. Truth = truth. When something rings true a person often adopts it as his or her own.

[identity profile] poliphilo.livejournal.com 2011-06-22 08:13 pm (UTC)(link)
Quite so.

[identity profile] poliphilo.livejournal.com 2011-06-22 08:12 pm (UTC)(link)
I'm beginning to think plagiarism is the wrong word. I've been looking all day for sayings of Jesus that are duplicated elsewhere and thus far I've only found two- both from rabbinical sources. Quotations from scripture don't count, I think, because the earliest readers would have recognised them
as quotations and so there can have been no intention to claim them for Jesus as original sayings.

[identity profile] methodius.livejournal.com 2011-06-23 04:26 am (UTC)(link)
I don't know about the sayings of Jesus, but you might find this interesting: Budge, E.A. Wallis, (ed) 1923. Barlaam and Yewasef: being the Ethiopic version of a Christianized rescension of the Buddhist legend of the Buddha and the Bodhisattva.

It was among the most popular pieces of Christian literature in Medieval Russia.

[identity profile] poliphilo.livejournal.com 2011-06-23 09:23 am (UTC)(link)
Good grief- you can't get more cosmopolitan than that!