Another Tuesday Talk

[poliphilo]

This morning's Tuesday Talk at the Whitworth was a bit dull.  It dealt with an exhibition few in the audience will have seen (because it was in London) and none of us will ever see in future (because it closed last month). On the way home- prompted by the speaker's characterisation of himself as a "high modernist"  who distrusts narrative-  we discussed whether art could ever free itself from narrative and decided it couldn't.

Comments

[clindau.livejournal.com]

we discussed whether art could ever free itself from narrative and decided it couldn't.

I suppose even the most abstract of abstract art has a narrative of some kind; but some of the stuff irks me so much that I don't even want to spend time trying to puzzle it out.

[oakmouse]

I think you're quite right. Art doesn't exist in a vacuum; it happens in a context, and it's very hard (if not impossible) to find a context that has no narrative. Even if narrative doesn't explicitly exist in visible form in the art (as in some types of abstract expressionism), it exists in the painter and informs the painter's making of art, and it exists in the observers and informs the observers' perception of the art.

IMO narrative is like oxygen; you can get completely clear of it, yes, but not in an environment where human beings (us highly verbal, narrative-structured creatures) can survive.