Trouble Ahead
Sep. 12th, 2010 12:21 pmAccording to this morning's headlines George Osborne plans to knock £2.5 billion off the sickness and disability budget. This makes me nervous. Ailz and I are dependent on disability payments.
But we're not alone. The anxiety I feel is replicated all through the economy- at every level except the very highest. Anyone who's not in Osborne's income bracket is going to be squeezed, harried and whacked around by this government's proposed programme of cuts.
Now here's something I really don't understand. The government is proposing to cut welfare at precisely the moment when thousands upon thousands of people will be turfed out onto the streets as workforces are shrunk and businesses go under. Has Osborne done his maths, or is he- as I suspect- making it up as he goes along?
I think there will be trouble. I think we're going to have civil unrest on a scale we haven't seen since the '80s. Actually it could be much worse than the 80s- because the proposed cuts are much bigger and more drastic than anything Thatcher attempted.
The coalition government is a government of the very rich. It is made up of people who have never had to worry about their next pay-check. They would like to destroy the Welfare State because- looking down from their unthreatened eyries- they have never seen the point of it. Thus far they have carried the people with them because we all understand the need to do something about the deficit. This acquiescence is about to end.
But we're not alone. The anxiety I feel is replicated all through the economy- at every level except the very highest. Anyone who's not in Osborne's income bracket is going to be squeezed, harried and whacked around by this government's proposed programme of cuts.
Now here's something I really don't understand. The government is proposing to cut welfare at precisely the moment when thousands upon thousands of people will be turfed out onto the streets as workforces are shrunk and businesses go under. Has Osborne done his maths, or is he- as I suspect- making it up as he goes along?
I think there will be trouble. I think we're going to have civil unrest on a scale we haven't seen since the '80s. Actually it could be much worse than the 80s- because the proposed cuts are much bigger and more drastic than anything Thatcher attempted.
The coalition government is a government of the very rich. It is made up of people who have never had to worry about their next pay-check. They would like to destroy the Welfare State because- looking down from their unthreatened eyries- they have never seen the point of it. Thus far they have carried the people with them because we all understand the need to do something about the deficit. This acquiescence is about to end.
no subject
Date: 2010-09-12 11:26 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-09-12 11:53 am (UTC)I think we may well bring this government down. Perhaps within the year.
no subject
Date: 2010-09-12 01:19 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-09-12 02:18 pm (UTC)I do hope it isn't as bad as it seems.
Do you think this might actually bring down the government?
no subject
Date: 2010-09-12 03:08 pm (UTC)What's your solution to the deficit?
no subject
Date: 2010-09-12 03:11 pm (UTC)It's hard to know what's going to happen. All these rumours are swirling round, but little has been fixed.
no subject
Date: 2010-09-12 03:18 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-09-12 03:41 pm (UTC)Sorry, that's a flippant reply. I'm not an economist, but I understand that many who are view the government's programme as unnecessarily- even dangerously- savage.
Encouraging the unemployed to take jobs is fine, but are the jobs going to be there? Only yesterday we heard that BAE Systems- a big employer round these parts- will be sacking thousands. This is in anticipation of the coming defence cuts. The government doesn't want to pay benefits, but it's pursuing policies that are going to vastly increase the ranks of the unemployed. Maybe I'm missing something, but I can't see how this makes any sense.
no subject
Date: 2010-09-12 04:01 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-09-12 04:08 pm (UTC)Quite agree about the millionaires, though. Just as as individuals are having their tax position assiduously "reconciled" to their disadvantage, HMRC has decided to take a "less combative" approach to disputes with big businesses, with the permanent secretary David Hartnett (everyone's favourite taxman) quoted in the FT as saying of his own department that it was "sometimes too black-and-white about the law." The upshot is that businesses that use sufficiently savvy about tax avoidance to make collection hard work are being systematically let off the hook. (For one example, see the story of Vodafone's £6 billion let-off in the last Private Eye.)
no subject
Date: 2010-09-12 04:20 pm (UTC)Oh dear, that's really, really annoying.
I'm trying to gear up for the coming class war. I just wish I had more appetite for it.
no subject
Date: 2010-09-12 04:56 pm (UTC)Jobs? There are none. Thousands of them, too many to count, are now being done in India or China, or even Mexico. If one is over 50 years of age and becomes unemployed, there is practically no chance that they will find a paying job.
I note that your government is also kowtowing to Big Business. How sad that free people have become enslaved by corporations! How sad, that most national income finds its way into the hands of those who do NOT need it!
no subject
Date: 2010-09-12 04:59 pm (UTC)"Those who forget to remember the past are condemned to repeat it."
no subject
Date: 2010-09-12 05:00 pm (UTC)And here's hoping that Washington is watching...
no subject
Date: 2010-09-12 08:28 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-09-12 08:58 pm (UTC)"I tell you naught for your comfort,
Yea, naught for your desire,
Save that the sky grows darker yet
And the sea rises higher."