At The End Of The Passage
"At The End of the Passage" regularly turns up in anthologies of great ghost stories. Like many of the best in the genre- "The Turn of the Screw" for example- it leaves us with questions. Were there really spooks involved or was everything in the mind? And if the spooks are real why exactly is Hummil being haunted? I have never been able to decide whether Kipling's decision to leave all the doors open and idly flapping is a strength or a weakness.
Rating it purely for scariness- and how else should you judge a ghost story?- I give it no more than 4 or 5 out of 10. "Things in a dead man's eye?" No, I don't believe in that either. The most unsettling moment comes when- having always observed Hummil from the outside- we are suddenly jolted into his shoes and see what he sees- as he sees it.
The true horror is existential. Four men gather to play cards once a week, in choking heat, in a bungalow with a torn ceiling cloth, not because they particularly like one another, but because they'd otherwise go mad from boredom and stress. If I don't rate this as one of Kipling's masterpieces it's because I feel it might have been even better- by which I mean more frightening- without the ghosts.
Rating it purely for scariness- and how else should you judge a ghost story?- I give it no more than 4 or 5 out of 10. "Things in a dead man's eye?" No, I don't believe in that either. The most unsettling moment comes when- having always observed Hummil from the outside- we are suddenly jolted into his shoes and see what he sees- as he sees it.
The true horror is existential. Four men gather to play cards once a week, in choking heat, in a bungalow with a torn ceiling cloth, not because they particularly like one another, but because they'd otherwise go mad from boredom and stress. If I don't rate this as one of Kipling's masterpieces it's because I feel it might have been even better- by which I mean more frightening- without the ghosts.
no subject
It may not be the most successful scary story in the world, but I thought the photographic aspect helped wrench us from the mindest of "Hummil gone mad" to "maybe there was something."
If one posits that there are things in India that are beyond the ken of the sahibs, then Hummil could have done something as inadvertent as whats-his-name did in "The Mark of the Beast."
no subject
no subject
I wonder, having just read "The Mark of the Beast", whether the eyeless weeping face might have belonged to a spirit based on a leper. (Oh, and what's-his-name was Fleete.)
no subject
no subject