Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
poliphilo: (Default)
[personal profile] poliphilo
On reflection I hate this book. Two wealthy, beautiful, American, white people fall in love and get married. They are supported  in their idleness by life-affirming people of colour.  He and she claim to be punks and class warriors whilst  sucking up to her big corporate daddy, wallowing  in privilege and growing rich through what can only be described as insider trading- because- see- he's a time traveller and he's got the dope on the coming dotcom boom. Ah, but  there's the rub! Time travel isn't all fun: for one thing he never goes anywhere interesting (Wot, no ancient Romans? wot no, spacemen?)  and secondly its dangerous and embarrassing.  Sadly, he can't control it- it's a genetic aberration (yeah, right!)- and what  if he disappears in the middle of the wedding ceremony and embarrasses daddy in front of his powerful friends? The ending is tragic- long drawn out and dripping with molasses (Oh, just get on with it!)- but not to worry, because they have a perfect child and he (the traveller) isn't entirely dead because earlier versions of him keep popping up in his family's future.

I'm sure there's a film in the pipeline- probably starring a soulful Jim Carrey. There has to be.  Perhaps it already came out and flopped. 

Date: 2008-07-17 10:06 am (UTC)
ext_37604: (knew it all by sinsense)
From: [identity profile] glitzfrau.livejournal.com
From your summary, you are so right about the Jim Carey-ness of it all. And I haven't even read the book!

Date: 2008-07-17 10:44 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] halfmoon-mollie.livejournal.com
Yay! Someone who affirms my opinion. I did NOT like this book. (I also remembered their child as a daughter, but as I say I didn't like the book.) You can bet if they make a movie of it, it will be well received - it's just the kind of pap that most people seem to love.

I like the Outlander books, when it comes to time travel. They aren't historically accurate, but they're fun, even if my Scot professor refers to one of the main characters as 'Jamie with the Laughing Thighs'.

Date: 2008-07-17 11:10 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] jackiejj.livejournal.com
Thanks for the review--I'll pass on it, then. I keep seeing it in the library.

I'm reading a book that's so darkly witty, and it keeps reminding me of your style. I'm laughing out loud reading it--Mark Haddon's A Spot of Bother, about (loosely) a rather delicately balanced, hypochondriacal middle-aged Londoner:

Here's a quote:

"He was going to die.

"Maybe not this month. Maybge not this year. But somehow, at some time, in a manner and at a speed very much not of his choosing....

"With blinding clarity he realized that everyone was frolicking in a summer meadow surrounded by a dark and impenetrable forest, waiting for that grim day on which they were dragged into the dark beyond the trees and individually butchered.

"...Unaccountably he was now on all fours between the armchair and the television, rocking back and forth, attempting to comfort himself by making the sound of a cow."

Date: 2008-07-17 12:57 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] solar-diablo.livejournal.com
Only yesterday I was discussing Jim Carrey with coworkers, how I didn't much care for his brand of comedy, and his turns at drama even less. It's like Forrest Gump with three pounds of sugar dumped on it.

Haven't read the book, though. ;)

Date: 2008-07-17 03:48 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] wyrmwwd.livejournal.com
"Criminal Minds" had almost the same story line last night!

Date: 2008-07-17 03:55 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] athenais.livejournal.com
Oh, thank god, someone else who didn't like that book. It did not deserve the accolades it was getting.

Contrarian vote

Date: 2008-07-17 05:34 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] zoe-1418.livejournal.com
I *loved* the book and found it totally compelling.

Go figure.

Don't really want to see it made into a movie, I don't think. It would get hung up on special effects.

Date: 2008-07-17 08:22 pm (UTC)
sovay: (Default)
From: [personal profile] sovay
I feel less bad about never getting around to reading this book. The most interesting recommendation I have ever heard is that it can be taken as a version of Peter Wimsey and Harriet Vane, with time travel standing in for shellshock, but if so I think Dorothy Sayers is going to be haunting the author.

Date: 2008-07-18 02:38 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] goddlefrood.livejournal.com
I haven't read it, but I could tell it was unlikely to be too good when it made it onto Richard and Judy's book list. Or was it Oprah's? Either way, once a book appears on one of those it's the kiss of death for it as far as I'm concerned.

Verdict: one to miss. Glad to have seen this though, in order to triply confirm that it should be avoided. Life's too short.

Date: 2008-07-18 09:28 am (UTC)
mokie: A squirrel giving another squirrel a massage (sore)
From: [personal profile] mokie
I thought it had already come out, with Denzel Washington, but I'm remembering another flop about somebody's wife.

The synopsis I read sounded like an interesting idea, like poking around at a life from all the odd angles and such, but alas, they chose to play it safe..

Date: 2008-07-20 01:50 pm (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
Aw, i loved that book. It was so lovely. oh well never mind!

http://web.mac.com/alicegrist

Check out my new webpage please - at wedding was great to see you. xxxx

Profile

poliphilo: (Default)
poliphilo

January 2026

S M T W T F S
     1 23
4 5 6 7 8 910
1112 13 14 15 16 17
18 19 20 21222324
25262728293031

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Page generated Jan. 22nd, 2026 06:05 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios