"Oh my God!" says Ailz.
"What?" I ask
"It's A vertical clitoral piercing." She calls me over to her monitor to view it- though I'd rather not. She's on one of those sites.
"Oh Jesus!" she says, moments later
I trek back across the room. This one has multiple piercings- and the whole genital area is enclosed within a tattoo of a carniverous looking flower.
"I'm not sure about that," she says.
Me neither.
Ailz does have a tattoo- a tiny butterfly on her left shoulder- so small you could mistake it for a birthmark. I don't and I never would. Two reasons.
(Please understand; I'm not trying to get at anyone. I often admire other people's tattoos. This is just about me.)
First I have a bit of a phobia about needles. That's self-explanatory, I think
The second goes deeper. I can't think of any image I wouldn't quickly get bored with. My enthusiasms are fleeting. I move on. This year it could well seem like a good idea to have a portrait of Balzac incised on my biceps, but next year it almost certainly won't- because I'll be reading someone else. I don't want to become a walking billboard for yesterday's alliegances.
And there's a third- now I think of it: tattoo art is just not good enough. It mostly comes out of a book- which means it's mass-produced- like wallpaper. Also it's mostly kitsch. If the Chapman brothers did tattoos I suppose I might be tempted- but then again, no, because (a) they'd charge too much and (b) it would still involve needles.
"Ooh Tone, come and see!"
Not more piercings, please.
Ah, no. This one is much more up my street. And it's in the Daily Telegraph (classy!) These ghosthunters were walking over the battlefield of Naesby and they heard clunking sounds and then one of them snapped a picture of a ghostly soldier walking out of the trees...
"What?" I ask
"It's A vertical clitoral piercing." She calls me over to her monitor to view it- though I'd rather not. She's on one of those sites.
"Oh Jesus!" she says, moments later
I trek back across the room. This one has multiple piercings- and the whole genital area is enclosed within a tattoo of a carniverous looking flower.
"I'm not sure about that," she says.
Me neither.
Ailz does have a tattoo- a tiny butterfly on her left shoulder- so small you could mistake it for a birthmark. I don't and I never would. Two reasons.
(Please understand; I'm not trying to get at anyone. I often admire other people's tattoos. This is just about me.)
First I have a bit of a phobia about needles. That's self-explanatory, I think
The second goes deeper. I can't think of any image I wouldn't quickly get bored with. My enthusiasms are fleeting. I move on. This year it could well seem like a good idea to have a portrait of Balzac incised on my biceps, but next year it almost certainly won't- because I'll be reading someone else. I don't want to become a walking billboard for yesterday's alliegances.
And there's a third- now I think of it: tattoo art is just not good enough. It mostly comes out of a book- which means it's mass-produced- like wallpaper. Also it's mostly kitsch. If the Chapman brothers did tattoos I suppose I might be tempted- but then again, no, because (a) they'd charge too much and (b) it would still involve needles.
"Ooh Tone, come and see!"
Not more piercings, please.
Ah, no. This one is much more up my street. And it's in the Daily Telegraph (classy!) These ghosthunters were walking over the battlefield of Naesby and they heard clunking sounds and then one of them snapped a picture of a ghostly soldier walking out of the trees...
no subject
Date: 2008-07-14 09:20 am (UTC)I also have the same problem as you over what to pick. I favoured a small curled-up cat for some time. Now I fancy either the Gilera motorcycle logo (even if I switch brands, the years I spent with the Gilera have been happy ones) or a pawprint.
no subject
Date: 2008-07-14 09:27 am (UTC)While most tattoos have that mass produced look, that doesn't stop there being true artists out there who are creating original works of art every day.
Which is of course the same thing one might say about the Chapman brothers.
If you want original, find an artist. If you want mass produced, find a draftsman.
no subject
Date: 2008-07-14 09:36 am (UTC)A motorcycle logo gets my approval. That has style.
no subject
Date: 2008-07-14 09:38 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-07-14 09:50 am (UTC)I thought of having the logo shaved into the back of my head for the Milan motorcycle show, but didn't get round to it. I'm sure there'll be another occasion.
no subject
Date: 2008-07-14 10:13 am (UTC)Wearing it as a hairstyle is safer though. It's the foreverness of tattoos that worries me most.
no subject
Date: 2008-07-14 10:13 am (UTC)http://www.eclipsebodyart.co.uk/tattoo_design_gallery.htm
http://www.tattoolivingimage.com/rob/rob.htm
Not everything there is stand out, but there's some lovely pieces.
no subject
Date: 2008-07-14 10:38 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-07-14 11:26 am (UTC)What a strange world we live in....
no subject
Date: 2008-07-14 01:23 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-07-14 01:25 pm (UTC)Not that I'm advocating either.
no subject
Date: 2008-07-14 01:37 pm (UTC)Some impressive stuff there, but I think it's kinda creepy to go round wearing your children's faces on your arms.
no subject
Date: 2008-07-14 01:45 pm (UTC)I'm not saying I like it all - I see a lot of tattoos where I'm certain I wouldn't want that on me permanently or even semi-permanently.
But then it's taken me 20 years to find a design I'm certain of; I just haven't got around to getting it inked yet.
no subject
Date: 2008-07-14 01:48 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-07-14 02:44 pm (UTC)However, one thing is, people do change. so each of my tattoos has a lot of thinking and planning and consideration behind it.
I have never regretted a single one... not for a moment.
But I do understand your reservations. If you don't feel like there is something that you need to express for a lifetime, then don't do it.
Also, your fear of needles is valid. Tattoos HURT. They hurt different people different amounts, and the amount of pain received is directly related to the position on the body. My last one has about 8 hours of work into it, about $800 of money so far, and will still require another 6 hours and $600 to complete. This is no small investment in time, money and pain.
It is not something that you do because everyone else does.
no subject
Date: 2008-07-14 03:48 pm (UTC)Over the years however, I have had artist friends draw all over me, so I can enjoy the look of tattoos for a few days, with NO NEEDLES!
no subject
Date: 2008-07-14 04:48 pm (UTC)I suppose it's about making a statement, about reinforcing one's own identity. Or is it? Not having ever wanted one, I'm not sure what the motive would be.
I like looking at other people's though. My son keeps acquiring new ones.
no subject
Date: 2008-07-14 04:50 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-07-14 06:14 pm (UTC)My art has also been tattooed on people, however, which I... think I find flattering, if somewhat astonishing. :)
no subject
Date: 2008-07-14 11:39 pm (UTC)Tattoos are mostly an internal process for me, anchoring myself in place and in time, than about what other people think.
no subject
Date: 2008-07-15 05:42 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-07-15 09:01 am (UTC)I have a couple of pieces of jewellery I always wear. I reckon they serve a similar purpose.
no subject
Date: 2008-07-15 09:07 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-07-15 02:19 pm (UTC)Important distinction, I think.
no subject
Date: 2008-07-15 02:38 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-07-15 03:16 pm (UTC)Personally, I have no piercings, no tattoos, and have never been tempted to get them, either. I bear my scars, inside and out, with a certain pride and feel no need to add to their number.
no subject
Date: 2008-07-15 04:30 pm (UTC)Laughing Out Loud.
Thanks for this.
no subject
Date: 2008-07-15 06:22 pm (UTC)And To-to.
no subject
Date: 2008-07-15 06:37 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-07-15 07:07 pm (UTC)