Staying The Course. Not
Oct. 25th, 2006 11:39 amIt has been noted that president Bush is no longer using that mantra about staying the course in Iraq. Last night I saw a clip from a news conference where a White House spokesman acknowledged this and said it was because the mantra was being "misunderstood".
Tony Blair is still saying that Britain will stand firm until the job is done- whatever that means. I guess he hasn't received his orders yet.
It would be nice to think that Iraq was the last colonial adventure- that the Western powers will have learned that it's no longer in their power (if indeed it ever was) to march into countries they barely understand and sort them out.
I'm not going to argue the pros and cons of Imperialism. I'm not sure I could, anyway. I have all sorts of conflicting ideas.
The point is that that phase of human history is over. It ended fifty years ago. The Empires have been dismantled, The colonial wars have been lost.
It's time for the White Man to put down his self-appointed burden, sit on his hands and mind his own business.
Tony Blair is still saying that Britain will stand firm until the job is done- whatever that means. I guess he hasn't received his orders yet.
It would be nice to think that Iraq was the last colonial adventure- that the Western powers will have learned that it's no longer in their power (if indeed it ever was) to march into countries they barely understand and sort them out.
I'm not going to argue the pros and cons of Imperialism. I'm not sure I could, anyway. I have all sorts of conflicting ideas.
The point is that that phase of human history is over. It ended fifty years ago. The Empires have been dismantled, The colonial wars have been lost.
It's time for the White Man to put down his self-appointed burden, sit on his hands and mind his own business.
no subject
Date: 2006-10-25 11:54 am (UTC)I do agree that the entire system is largely dead; international trade has pretty much taken over because the benefits of colonization had more to do with hostilities between colonizers that disappeared with ECM and Atlantic-Pacific trade zones.
no subject
Date: 2006-10-25 12:02 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-10-25 03:09 pm (UTC)I understand the sentiment, but I'm not certain isolationism is any better than imperialism. I'm fairly certain that white man's guilt accomplishes a whole lot of nothing.
no subject
Date: 2006-10-25 07:52 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-10-25 08:02 pm (UTC)"Neo-imperialism" insofar as it is related to real "cultural imperialism" is probably something along those lines: the rebuilding of nations in the image one's own and thereby extending "cultural territory" if not reaping economic rewards.
no subject
Date: 2006-10-25 08:07 pm (UTC)I'm not really arguing from a moral position here. I don't think the 19th century empires were unequivocally bad. What I'm saying is that empire, good or bad, is no longer workable.
no subject
Date: 2006-10-25 08:20 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-10-25 08:23 pm (UTC)And for other reasons.
BTW, Tony, I got this (here's a portion of it) in a spam email and thought of you--didn't you get something like this last year?
"bingley before, expressed to her sister just how very much she admired him.by mrs. hurst and miss bingley they were noticed only by a curtsey; and, on their being seated,
"i do, i do like him," she replied, with tears in her eyes, "i love him. indeed he has no improper
elizabeth had the satisfaction of seeing her father taking pains to get acquainted with him; andcertain she could never bestow a favour unworthily. it was really a very handsome thought. upon the...."
Actually, it went on and on.
Why do people do this? Do they think we are going to correspond with them because they like good literature? There's nothing to buy...
no subject
Date: 2006-10-25 08:26 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-10-25 09:43 pm (UTC)misunderstood as what?
was that supposed to mean something?
i'm just glad he stopped using it...
or will he really?
no subject
Date: 2006-10-25 10:22 pm (UTC)That is the only crime for which I support the death penalty.
no subject
Date: 2006-10-25 10:31 pm (UTC)Your guess is as good as mine.
The Bush administration is trying desperately hard to put a positive spin on what is increasingly coming to look like the defeat of their project in Iraq.
no subject
Date: 2006-10-25 10:46 pm (UTC)what makes the white house think this was an ok thing to have happened for so long?
i mean - why was this allowed to continue?
i just have too many questions and they boggle my mind...
no subject
Date: 2006-10-26 03:41 am (UTC)But who learns anything from history?
The Americans should have learned just a little bit from the failure of the Russian occupation of Afghanistan, which was within living memory, but they didn't.
As long as humanity endures, fools will continue to rush in...
no subject
Date: 2006-10-26 03:50 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-10-26 08:25 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-10-26 08:29 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-10-26 08:32 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-10-26 08:34 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-10-26 11:23 am (UTC)Thirty seconds of practice would correct it.
He's a stubborn old monkey.
no subject
Date: 2006-10-26 01:41 pm (UTC)and just exactly what "job" is that?
after awhile i thought clinton as president was a joke, but bush goes beyond being ridiculous...it makes me wonder if he hears the words that come out of his mouth...
it's frightening to think that this "conflict" could go on and on...
no subject
Date: 2006-10-26 02:29 pm (UTC)Remember Vietnam? America wasn't going to back away from that one either- but it did.
no subject
Date: 2006-10-26 03:00 pm (UTC)12-18 months or so until iraqi forces can take responsibility...
that was said awhile ago...
would you give it longer?
no subject
Date: 2006-10-26 04:57 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-10-26 07:11 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-10-26 09:23 pm (UTC)