Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags

Oct. 28th, 2020

poliphilo: (Default)
I wish Little Nell didn't weep so much.

For Dickens weeping is attractive and engaging. It shows heart. And all his supposedly sympathetic characters well up at the slightest provocation- especially the women. We think of it as a Victorian thing, but it started with Rousseau and the romantics- and by the time Dickens was writing his early novels the cult of sensibility they started was at full tide- and beginning to ebb. We are separated from that culture by many decades of the stiff upper lip- a way of dealing with awfulness which is as inhuman as the cult of tears was soppy.

I'm trying to like Little Nell- trying, that is, to experience her as Dickens's first readers did. We like our fictional kids to be sparkier but, if you set cultural prejudice aside, I don't think she's such a bad sketch of a shy, unworldly little girl. There are moments when she puts me in mind of Carroll's Alice. "Is waxwork funnier than Punch?" she asks Mrs Jarley- and that's a very Alice question- one that cuts to the quick- because how can waxwork be superior to Punch- as Mrs Jarley insists it is- unless it amuses us more? The funnier the better, that's not a bad critical maxim to carry through life.

If only she didn't weep so much.

Profile

poliphilo: (Default)
poliphilo

July 2025

S M T W T F S
   1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20212223242526
2728293031  

Most Popular Tags

Page Summary

Style Credit

Page generated Jul. 20th, 2025 02:01 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios