poliphilo: (Default)
poliphilo ([personal profile] poliphilo) wrote2018-05-12 09:13 am

Exhibitionist With Fishes

The west front of Rochester cathedral is Romanesque. Beautiful arcading, beautiful diaper work.



I called Ailz over.

"See that figure in the central lunette. I think it's a Sheela-na-gig. What do you think?" She thought it was too. But it was a long way off the ground and we couldn't be sure of the details.

When I got home I blew up the image and it became rather more mysterious.



I think we can agree that it's an exhibitionist- that's to say- a grotesque figure displaying "those parts that men delight to see". They can be either male or female- and in this instance someone has taken a hammer to the crucial area so we can't be sure. I imagine the vandalism was deliberate- and probably took place in the 19th century- when people were more irked by public indecency than at any time before or since. The face is well-weathered but I rather think I can see a big moustache and a little beard, so it's probably male. But the really odd thing is it has a large fish in either hand.

Is it a merman? A river god?

Rochester sits on the banks of the river Medway so that last suggestion is the one I'm going for...
cmcmck: (Default)

[personal profile] cmcmck 2018-05-12 10:41 am (UTC)(link)
You're making me homesick, already!
cmcmck: (Default)

[personal profile] cmcmck 2018-05-12 12:00 pm (UTC)(link)
But becoming more and more like London on the Medway and in the end, we couldn't stay any longer- we were priced out and we're not short of a bob or two!
cmcmck: (Default)

[personal profile] cmcmck 2018-05-12 05:48 pm (UTC)(link)
That said, Rochester has long been a marginal as have Gillingham and Chatham & Aylesford.