This is Sir Thomas Cawne, first owner of Ightham Mote.
Medieval tomb effigies don't come much finer than this. It's been suggested it may be from the same workshop as the effigy of The Black Prince in Canterbury Cathedral.
Ightham doesn't make it into Simon Jenkins' bumper book of great English churches- and I'm shocked. It's a pretty little building and the monuments are fabulous.
A lot of these effigies are terribly bashed about. I suspect it has a lot to do with the quality (meaning hardness) of the stone. Sir Thomas has had his nose flattened but otherwise he's looking good.
Mind you, he would probably have been painted in bright heraldic colours when new.
I really love these... as well as the busts from the Roman era. I assume that this is what they did instead of photography. I love things that show me what these folks looked like.
The Romans cared about getting a good likeness. I'm not sure the medievals did. Their idea of a handsome knight or beautiful lady seems to have been fairly standardized- and it's only towards the middle of the 15th century that we start to get strongly individualised portraits.
On the other hand I was watching a documentary about King John the other night and one of the scholars interviewed was saying that the effigy on John's tomb is likely to be an fairly accurate portrait- so who knows?
no subject
I can see why that suggestion might get made.
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
Mind you, he would probably have been painted in bright heraldic colours when new.
no subject
no subject
On the other hand I was watching a documentary about King John the other night and one of the scholars interviewed was saying that the effigy on John's tomb is likely to be an fairly accurate portrait- so who knows?
no subject