Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
poliphilo: (Default)
[personal profile] poliphilo
The Mail leads with allegations of sex abuse against Cyril Smith. They're only thirty years too late. What I can't work out is whether this is a subtle way of drawing attention to unmentionable scandals about living politicians or of deflecting it. The Mail suggests that successive governments- Labour and Tory- protected Big Cyril in order to keep the Liberals sweet. Are Mail readers saying "Ooh, weren't the 70s awful!" or asking themselves whether something similar may not be going on today?

The establishment would much rather we oohed and aahed about Smith than show any curiosity about ****** or ******** or ****** ****** but they must wonder whether it's in their interests to keep the topic in the headlines. How long will the public be content to mumble over dry old bones when there are fresh ones for the picking? 

Re: The Turkey Situation.

Date: 2012-11-24 11:13 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] poliphilo.livejournal.com
It's bubbling under. The effects of it all boiling over are incalculable.

Re: The Turkey Situation.

Date: 2012-11-24 12:22 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] poliphilo.livejournal.com
Yes. They might be willing to sacrifice one or two of their number if only they could be sure it would stop there.

Re: The Turkey Situation.

Date: 2012-11-24 01:12 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] poliphilo.livejournal.com
Do the British proles have the spunk or are they- as Lennon said- too well "doped with religion and sex and TV"?

Profile

poliphilo: (Default)
poliphilo

January 2026

S M T W T F S
     1 23
4 5 6 7 8 910
1112 13 14 15 16 17
18192021222324
25262728293031

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Page generated Jan. 19th, 2026 06:22 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios