The End Of The Labour Party?

[poliphilo]

I know what the Tories are for. They exist to serve the powers that be (which these days means the bankers and the corporations) and keep the little people in their place. But Labour?

The Labour party was created as the political arm of an industrial working class that no longer exists. Tony Blair and his gang "modernised" it- and made it indistinguishable in thought, word and deed from the Conservative Party. They kept it going on spin and charisma and by the end of their three terms had stripped it of all credibility as a party of the left. Ed Miliband tinkered and fiddled-but to little effect- and now it's nothing but a heap of rusting, clapped out machinery- and there has to be a real question- after the battering it took in this last election- whether it can be made to go again. Because- except as a vehicle for political ambitions- what on earth is the point of it?

Comments

[glitzfrau.livejournal.com]

For me, the point is that it's the only party that fights for social justice. It aims to unite all classes to make life better for the poor and poorest, and to fight discrimination. And that's why I'm a proud member.

[poliphilo.livejournal.com]

But does it really?

Miliband and Balls were promising to continue with austerity and keep Trident...oh, and control immigration.
They even blazoned that last promise on a mug.

[ingenious76.livejournal.com]

Yes. Austerity would have stayed even if they had got in. In fact, a worse scenario would have been austerity south of the border and more cash going north.

[poliphilo.livejournal.com]

I'm not economist but I know a lot of reputable economists think austerity was quite the worst way of tackling the recession- and has in fact slowed down recovery.

[glitzfrau.livejournal.com]

I don't agree with all their policies, but Labour is a coalition. It has to appeal to workers on the Trident base and people whose wages have been undercut by immigrants as well as to champagne socialists like me.

[poliphilo.livejournal.com]

What I'm not getting from Labour is any kind of vision of the just society. They've conceded too much to the Tories- and they fought the recent election with a set of Tory policies and Tory slogans (hard-working families, indeed!)

I'd have preferred a Miliband government to a Cameron government but I wouldn't have put much faith in it.

[glitzfrau.livejournal.com]

Well yes, of course: the lack of a clear vision and the lack of trustworthiness was a huge part of why we lost. Sigh. I trusted Ed Miliband's vision.

[michaleen.livejournal.com]

Our feckless Democrats have the same problem: lack of vision. Too many Dems get reelected by simply being not quite so evil as their eye-rolling-insane opponent. Sadly, that's not nearly enough to keep the crazy at bay. They need to articulate a meaningful vision for the future, something people actually want, something that will get them to the polls. So far, most Democrats simply won't. Neo-liberalism is the conventional wisdom of the day and few even pretend to challenge it.